By Henry Srebrnik, Saint John Telegraph-Journal
Since becoming Prime Minister, Mark Carney has been trying to edge Canada closer to its Commonwealth partners, especially the old so-called white dominions. Given this turn, it’s interesting to see how some of them are dealing with their own “settler-indigenous” issues.
In many respects, New Zealand has arguably the most robust process, perhaps because it has to come to terms with its very strong and united indigenous nation-within-a-nation, the Maori. This may have a bearing on future Crown-indigenous relations in this country.
Growing numbers of British migrants began arriving in New Zealand in the late 1830s, and there were plans for extensive settlement. Around this time there were large-scale land transactions with its indigenous Maori people and unruly behaviour by some settlers.
Fearing their potential total loss of the islands of Aotearoa –the Maori name for the country -- to Pakeha (Europeans), in 1835 some 50 Maori chiefs signed a Declaration of Independence; in return for the friendship and protection Maori would give British subjects, the chiefs invited Great Britain to protect the “infant state” from attempts on its independence.
What followed was the Treaty of Waitangi, the 1840 agreement, in Maori and English, made between the British Crown and about 540 Maori chiefs. The Treaty is a broad statement of principles on which the British and Maori made a political compact to found a state and build a government in New Zealand.
In the English version, Maori ceded the sovereignty of New Zealand to Britain and, in return, were guaranteed full rights of ownership of their lands, forests, fisheries and other possessions. But in the Maori version, the Maori believed they were retaining the absolute right to manage their own affairs.
The exclusive right to determine the meaning of the Treaty rests with the Waitangi Tribunal, a commission of inquiry created in 1975 to investigate alleged breaches of the Treaty by the Crown. The Maori population has been growing, with the latest estimates indicating a population of around 904,000 – about 18 per cent of the country’s 5.35 million inhabitants. In response to waves of Maori protest and resurgence in the 1980s, the Tribunal was given broader powers.
Since 1992, New Zealand uses a Mixed Member Proportional (MMP) electoral system to choose its 120-member House of Representatives. Each elector gets two votes, a party vote and an “electorate” (seat) vote. The party vote decides the total number of seats each political party gets. Parties also try to win as many electorate seats for individual MPs as possible. They must get at least five per cent of the party vote or win an electorate seat before they can have any seats in Parliament.
Every area in New Zealand is covered by both a general and a Maori electorate seat; there are seven Maori seats, superimposed on the general ones to give Maori a more direct say in parliament. The other individual MPs represent 65 general electorate seats. The final group of members are selected from the party lists with no individual ridings. Proportional representation has led to an increase in minor parties entering parliament, making multi-party governments the norm. Recently, there has been support for the creation of Maori seats at local councils to ensure their needs are represented in decision-making.
The 2023 election saw a shift to the right, with the formation of a coalition government led by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s National Party, along with the ACT and New Zealand First parties, for a total of 68 MPs. In opposition are the former governing Labour Party, the Greens, and the Te Pati Maori (Maori Party).
Luxon’s administration has been criticized for cutting funding to programs benefiting Maori, including plans to disband the organisation to improve health services for the community. Luxon has defended his government’s record, citing plans to improve literacy in the community and move children out of emergency housing.
But the Maori economy is “thriving,” according to a July 16 report by the Wellbeing Economy Alliance Aoteaora. It found that the Maori economy asset base has grown from $69 billion in 2018 to $126 billion in 2023, an increase of 83 per cent.
In March Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters of the New Zealand First Party asked House Speaker Gerry Brownlee to bar the use of the name Aotearoa, suggesting a referendum would be needed for anyone to use it in parliament.
A petition had been launched in 2022 by the Maori Party to officially change the country’s name to Aotearoa, which received more than 70,000 signatures. “New Zealand is a Dutch name and has no connection to this land,” party co-leader Rawiri Waititi remarked. Since the current administration came into power in 2023, it has required that government departments prioritise their English names and communicate primarily in English, unless they are specifically related to Maori.
On June 5, parliament voted to suspend three Maori Party MPs for their protest haka (a ceremonial war dance) during a sitting last year. They opposed the controversial Treaty Principles Bill introduced by ACT that sought to redefine the country’s founding treaty, because it divided the country by race.
While it failed in parliament, it became symbolic of what opponents characterized as the government’s anti-Maori agenda. It drew nationwide outrage, and more than 40,000 people protested it outside parliament.