By
Henry Srebrnik, [Summerside, PEI] Journal Pioneer
U.S.
President Donald Trump visited Poland in early July,
stressing the country’s importance as a loyal NATO ally.
“Poland
will always prevail,” he said, praising the courage and
spirit of the Polish people in a major speech at Warsaw’s
Krasinski Square on July 6.
The
backdrop to his address was the memorial to the Warsaw
Uprising of 1944 against Nazi Germany. It resulted in more
than 200,000 Polish deaths and the destruction of much of
the city.
Poland is among the five NATO members that
spend at least two per cent of their gross domestic product on
the military. It also hosts a contingent of about 900 U.S.
troops, and has for many years contributed to U.S. and NATO
missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
It is now acquiring a new American missile
system for its defence. After all, it still
shares a small border in the northeast with its historic
enemy, Russia.
Trump also met leaders of the 11 other
European Union member countries attending the Three Seas
Conference. It is intended to serve as a counterweight to
Franco-German dominance in European politics.
The country is doing very well. With a
population of nearly 40 million, Poland’s half-trillion-dollar
economy is already the world’s 24th largest. Exports continue
to boom and the trade balance is in surplus.
Poland
has been ruled since October 2015 by the Law and Justice
Party (Prawo i Sprawiedliwosc, or
PiS). It won 37.6 per cent of the vote in elections to the
Sejm, the lower house of parliament, good for 235 of its 460
seats.
Jaroslaw and Lech Kaczynski, twin brothers,
founded the party in 2001. Lech died in a plane crash in
Russia in 2010, while president of the country.
Jaroslaw is currently the party’s chair,
though not formally part of the government. He served for a little
over a year as prime minister in 2006-2007 during his
brother’s presidency.
The
right-wing PiS pursues a nationalist agenda and is more
skeptical than its liberal Civic Platform predecessor about
the EU, which Poland joined in 2004.
Poland
is a classical nation state; almost 97 per cent of its 38.6
million people are ethnic Polish-speaking Catholics, and
they want to keep it that way.
The European Commission, the executive arm
of the EU, on June 13 initiated legal action against Poland
for failing to comply with an order to take in thousands of
migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East.
The dispute dates back to September 2015,
when, at the height of Europe’s migration crisis, EU member
states voted to relocate 160,000 refugees already in Italy and
Greece to other parts of the bloc.
Nine countries in Central and Eastern
Europe were ordered to take in around 15,000 migrants. But
several refused. Poland was given a quota of 6,182 migrants,
not one of whom has been admitted.
Opposition to the EU demand was one of the
issues the PiS campaigned on during the October 2015 electoral
campaign.
Poland’s
PiS prime minister, Beata Szydlo, recently declared
that her country would not be “blackmailed" by EU officials.
“We are not going to take part in the
madness of the Brussels elite,” she told parliament on May 24.
“If you cannot see that terrorism currently has the potential
to hurt every country in Europe, and you think that Poland
should not defend itself, you are going hand in hand with
those who point this weapon against Europe, against all of
us.”
A few days earlier, Jaroslaw Kaczynski
blamed German Chancellor Angela Merkel for causing the bloc’s
migration problems, and insisted that Germany bear the
consequences, not Poland.
President Andrzej Duda, who is now
officially an independent, but came up through the rank of the
PiS, said on June 8 that he supports holding a referendum
asking Poles if they want to accept refugees, but not until
2019, and only if migration is still a “problem” then.
The current Polish government doesn’t agree
“with a mandatory redistribution of refugees to Poland,” he
told reporters.
The public certainly supports this
position. Some 70 per cent want to stop all migration from
Muslim countries; and 40 per cent say they would prefer
financial penalties to accepting the refugee quota.
The quarrel allows the Polish government to
further its narrative that this is part of a broader effort by
the EU to impinge on Poland’s “sovereign right to control its
own borders, cultural identity and security,” argues Daniel
Tilles, an assistant
professor of history at the Pedagogical University of Krakow.
It hurts the EU “for no benefit whatsoever.”
No comments:
Post a Comment