By Henry Srebrnik, [Calgary] Jewish Free Press
This year marks the 100th
anniversary of one of the seminal events of the 20th
century: the release of the Balfour Declaration.
There are few documents in Middle Eastern
history which have had as much influence as the Balfour
Declaration. It was sent as a 67-word statement contained
within the short letter addressed by the British Foreign
Secretary, Arthur Balfour, to Lord Rothschild, on November 2,
1917.
Before that date, Zionism was still a
marginal movement that divided Jews and was little noticed by
others. After the Balfour Declaration, the Jewish national
project enjoyed the support of the leading imperial power of
the age.
In the letter, the British government
stated its intention to endorse the establishment of a Jewish
home in Palestine:
“His Majesty's Government view with favour
the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the
Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate
the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood
that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and
religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in
Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews
in any other country.”
The Declaration emerged as part of
Britain’s growing desperation to seek allies in the ongoing
bloodbath of the First World War.
The Zionists had a hard time engaging the
interest of British officials at first. As late as 1913, the
chief diplomat of the World Zionist Organization, Nahum
Sokolow, could get a hearing at no higher a level than
low-level Foreign Office functionaries.
Many in the Anglo-Jewish elite themselves
opposed political Zionism. Edwin Samuel Montagu, for example,
a minister in the British government at the time, denied there
was a Jewish nation. “When the Jews are told that Palestine is
their national home, every country will immediately desire to
get rid of its Jewish citizens, and you will find a population
in Palestine driving out its present inhabitants.”
Much credit for turning things around is
credited to Chaim Weizmann, the Russian-born Zionist who, as a
scientist at the University of Manchester, helped the British
war effort by developing a new method for the manufacture of
acetone, used in the manufacture of cordite explosive
propellants critical to the Allied war effort. But this alone
would not have sufficed, of course.
The truly decisive moment in paving the way
to the Balfour Declaration took place on December 6, 1916,
when British Prime Minister Herbert Henry Asquith was
compelled to resign, and was replaced by David Lloyd George.
Asquith had no interest in Zionism and did
not support the Zionist aspirations, but Lloyd George and his
foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, believed that support for
Zionism would advance British war aims.
The problem, though, was that at the time
many Jews in the United States tended to favour Germany, due
to the fact that Britain was allied with tsarist Russia, home
of anti-Jewish political and economic repression and pogroms.
But this changed in the spring of 1917,
when, on March 15, Tsar Nicholas II abdicated and a liberal
regime emerged in Russia.
Now, the British believed, American Jews
could be persuaded to encourage their government to enter the
war, and Russian Jews would also throw their weight behind
efforts to ensure Germany's defeat and the creation of a
Jewish national home under British sponsorship.
Moreover, support for Jewish nationalism
might advance Britain’s territorial ambitions in Palestine.
Britain, after all, would do nearly all of
the expected fighting against Ottoman forces in the Sinai and
Palestine. Lloyd George and Balfour saw an opportunity to use
Zionism to gain international support to place the Holy Land
entirely under British rule.
Following
the end of the war, when Britain acquired a League of
Nations Mandate over Palestine, its purpose was partially to
put into effect the Balfour Declaration, in conjunction with
the World Zionist Organization.
The
Mandate specifically referred to “the historical connections
of the Jewish people with Palestine” and to the moral
validity of “reconstituting their National Home in that
country.”
Furthermore,
the British were instructed to “use their best endeavors to
facilitate” Jewish immigration, to encourage settlement on
the land and to “secure” the Jewish national home.
The
British would backtrack on these early promises. The
British establishment itself was divided and began to respond
negatively to Zionism by the late 1920s, in the face of Arab
hostility to Jewish immigration.
By the mid-1930s, fearing that the
Palestinian Arabs would side with Germany and Italy in a war
they knew would soon come, Britain increasingly reneged on
the Declaration’s commitments.
Indeed,
at the moment European Jews were most desperate to seek
entry to Palestine, the White Paper issued on May 17, 1939
virtually eliminated that possibility.
Still,
by the time the UN General Assembly on November 29, 1947
voted to partition Palestine into Arab and Jewish states,
the Jewish population had reached one-third of the Mandate’s
total of almost two million people. Six months later, the
State of Israel was born.
With the Balfour Declaration, Britain had
laid the foundations for a Jewish state -- and a conflict
between Arabs and Jews that a century later remains
unresolved.
No comments:
Post a Comment