Henry Srebrnik, [Summerside, PEI] Journal Pioneer
April 24 marked the centenary of the start of the genocide of the Armenian population in the Ottoman Empire during the First World War. Historians estimate that as many as 1.5 million Armenians were killed in state-organized violence between 1915 and 1922, some in massacres, others in forced marches to the Syrian desert that left them starved to death.
That this constituted genocide is the official view of Canada
and about 20 other countries – though not of Britain or the United States.
On April 12, Pope Francis, at a special mass in the Armenian
Catholic rite in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome to mark the anniversary, described
the mass killings as the “first genocide of the 20th century.”
The Pope was joined by Kerekin II, the Supreme Patriarch of
the Armenian Apostolic Church, Armenian President Serzh Sargasyan, and other
dignitaries. “Bishops and priests, religious women and men, the elderly and
even defenceless children and the infirm were murdered,” the Pope said.
This touched off a diplomatic furor with Turkey. President
Recep Tayyip Erdogan condemned the Pope’s words and warned him to “not repeat
this mistake.” Ankara recalled its ambassador to the Vatican.
“We will not allow historical incidents to be taken out of
their genuine context and be used as a tool to campaign against our country,”
Erdogan declared. “The Armenian diaspora is trying to instill hatred against
Turkey.”
Last year, Erdogan offered “condolences” to the families of
those who died and called the events “inhumane.” But Turkey rejects the use of
the term genocide to describe the killings, arguing it was part of a larger war
in which ethnic Turks, Kurds, and other Muslims also died.
In winter 1914 and spring 1915, there was fierce fighting in
eastern Anatolia between Turks and Armenians; sometimes the Armenians had
Russian help. So in May 1915, a law was passed calling for the “relocation” of
the entire Armenian population of eastern Anatolia.
Was the subsequent massacre of the Armenians a genocide? It
depends on the definition of the word, which was coined by a Polish Jewish
lawyer, Raphael Lemkin, during the Second World War.
Ethnic cleansing, massacres, and many other war crimes,
while reprehensible, are not the same as genocide, even if they involve large
numbers of deaths. What matters is the “intent” to destroy a group as such.
When he died, in
1959 Lemkin was nearly finished writing an autobiography. He described as a
formative experience the 1921 trial in Berlin of Soghomon Tehlirian, an
Armenian accused of murdering a former Ottoman minister of the interior, Mehmet
Taalat Pasha, one of the
architects of the killings.
Though
Lemkin himself later escaped death by fleeing Poland during the Nazi invasion and
coming to the United States, the
bulk of his family did not. Close to 50 of his relatives perished in the
Holocaust.
Lemkin’s life’s work was to make the destruction of a people
illegal. His book Axis Rule in Occupied Europe, published in 1944, first coined
the term “genocide,” identifying it as “actions aiming at the destruction of
essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of
annihilating the groups themselves.”
Thanks to his groundbreaking work, in 1948 the United
Nations passed the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment
of the Crime of Genocide, which defined genocide as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such.”
When Lemkin was asked in February 1949, just after the
Convention was ratified, why he became interested in genocide, he answered, “Because
it happened so many times. It happened to the Armenians.”
Certainly the evidence is incontrovertible: “Reports from
widely scattered districts indicate systematic attempts to uproot peaceful
Armenian populations,” read a telegram from the American embassy in Constantinople
to the State Department in Washington in 1915, with “wholesale expulsions and
deportations from one end of the Empire to the other.”
The American ambassador, Henry Morgenthau, asked the United
States government to intervene, but the U.S. was not a participant in the First
World War at the time. In his 1918 book Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story, he wrote that
when the Turkish authorities gave the orders for these deportations, “they were
merely giving the death warrant to a whole race; they understood this well,
and, in their conversations with me, they made no particular attempt to conceal
the fact.”
Turkey may today deny this was the case, but most historians
agree that the Armenian massacres do qualify as genocide.
No comments:
Post a Comment