By
Henry Srebrnik, [Charlottetown, PEI] Guardian
Most
refugees trying to get to Europe from Africa make a perilous
journey across the Mediterranean Sea to either Italy or the
Greek islands. Few people realize that the European Union
actually includes two tiny land borders with Africa.
They
are the two Spanish enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, both at
the northern tip of Morocco, on the Mediterranean itself.
Ceuta, in fact, sits just 14 kilometres across the sea from
Gibraltar, a British enclave on the Spanish side.
With
85,000 and 78,000 inhabitants, respectively, they are the
last surviving relics of the once vast Spanish empire. The
only two remaining European territories in mainland Africa
as well, together they cover about 35 square
kilometres.
As an integral part of Spain, they have
also been part of the territory of the European Union since
1986, when Spain was admitted to the EU. As such, they have
become a magnet for sub-Saharan migrants willing to cross
deserts and endure perilous conditions in search of a better
life.
The
two cities are now perceived by many Europeans as part of
the external threats the continent faces, and so they
present a problem not just for Spain, but between the entire
EU and Morocco.
The borders of the
enclaves have been increasingly reinforced by high fences,
armed border guards, and sophisticated electronic detection
systems.
The
two enclaves have a very long and contested history. Melilla
was occupied in 1497 as the first in a string of strongholds
along the North African coast by Isabel and Ferdinand, the
Spanish monarchs who unified Spain itself.
Ceuta,
initially conquered by Portugal, passed to Spain in 1580.
Morocco
signed a border treaty with Spain in the 19th century, when
it was still an independent county, but never recognized
Spanish sovereignty over the land.
Even
during the period between 1912 and 1956, when Spain governed
northern Morocco as a protectorate, the two enclaves kept
their status apart from the rest of Spanish territory.
When
Morocco regained its independence in 1956, Ceuta and Melilla
became part of a re-politicized border zone between two
sovereign states.
They
remain claimed by Morocco, while successive Spanish
governments have defended the “Spanishness” of the
territories for historical, geopolitical and symbolic
reasons.
They argue that the
enclaves belonged to Spain and formed an integral part of
Spanish identity long before the emergence of the Moroccan
state.
In
1991, Spain acceded to the Schengen Agreement, which removes
internal border controls within the EU. This led to
intensified Spanish border control, including, after 1998,
the construction of the fences.
But
Morocco complicated Spain’s decision by insisting that no
Spanish construction machinery operate on Moroccan soil. As
a result, even Spanish authorities concede that the fences
stand within what Spain considers to be its territory.
The
Spanish government has argued that reaching or even crossing
the fences is not enough to claim asylum. Instead, Madrid
has recently argued that the migrants must cross what it
calls an “operational border”-- set wherever the last line
of police security stands.
So
migrants who manage to scale all three fences around
Melilla, for example, struggle to understand why they are
sent back to Morocco just as they thought they had reached
safety in Spain.
Human
rights groups and the EU have strongly criticized Spain for
what they consider violations of both Spanish and
international law, including beatings of migrants and
summary expulsions with no due process.
But refugees remain undeterred. On Jan 1,
New Year’s Day, about 1,100 migrants tried to storm the border
with Ceuta. They knew that
during the festivities, Spanish border surveillance would be
low.
Another 600 tried to breach it on Feb. 20,
three days after hundreds of others used wire cutters and
other implements to storm the barrier. The authorities are now
considering using drones to further strengthen security.
No comments:
Post a Comment