By Henry Srebrnik, [Summerside, PEI] Journal Pioneer
Humans draw lines that divide the world
into specific places, territories, and categories; this has
been an essential component of activity for millennia.
Beginning as fuzzy zones between tribal
groups, boundaries became more clearly defined with the
development of states.
Following Europe’s wars of religion during
the sixteenth century culminating in the Peace of Westphalia
in 1648, frontiers across Europe morphed into fairly rigid
lines.
This model of organizing political space
was subsequently exported to the rest of the world through
European colonial conquest, most prominently during the
eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
By the late nineteenth century, the extent
of a nation’s territory had become an index of its power, with
overseas colonial possessions augmenting prestige and wealth
and redefining territoriality.
Without frontiers, there can be no exercise
of sovereignty -- the authority and control over a distinct
territory and its corresponding population and resources.
Territorial boundaries provide a framework for organizing
political and economic life.
National
borders create imagined communities, which are limited by
boundaries and are where people are aware of their
sovereignty within finite frontiers.
Harvard historian Charles S. Maier has
explored the evolution of territorial organization as a
worldwide practice of human societies. His 2016 book
Once Within Borders: Territories of Power, Wealth and Belonging
Since 1500, tracks the changes that have defined territories
over five centuries and draws attention to ideas and
technologies that contribute to territoriality’s remarkable
resilience.
At a time when the technologies of
globalization are eroding barriers to communication,
transportation, and trade, the
interdependence of economies and the emergence of cyberspace
seem to have reduced the salience of physical territorial
control and weakened traditional notions of sovereignty and
citizenship, he notes.
But if Maier is correct,
the rise of cross-border processes and institutions, often
defined as part of “globalization,” may challenge established
notions of territorial sovereignty, but they are far from
transcending them.
Territory will continue to
claim an important place in the human imagination. “People
still want frontiers. There’s a certain comfort in them,” he
suggested in a January interview with the Harvard Gazette.
They remain a foundation for statehood, power and identity.
“I thought that borders were coming down
all over, that we were moving toward a borderless world.
The
fall of the Berlin Wall remained a vivid memory. Going into
this project, I assumed territory didn’t matter as much as it
had earlier. Well, that was innocence. Now I think that if
borders are fading, they’re fading slowly and with a lot of
pushback.”
In fact states throughout the world are
enhancing their border security in an effort to better manage
the flows into and out of their territories. Good fences may
not make good neighbours, but they at least keep them from
causing trouble.
When the Berlin Wall was torn down
in 1989, there were 16 border fences around the world. Today,
there are at least 65 either completed or under construction.
Examples include the United States
constructing hundreds of miles of fencing along the Mexican
border (and this predates Donald Trump’s intention to build a
wall), and India fencing its 4,000-kilometre border with
Bangladesh and 2,900-kilometre border with Pakistan.
Pakistan has built fences along sections of
the Afghanistan border, while Iran strengthened its
700-kilomtre border with Pakistan.
Israel has constructed a 760-kilometre
security barrier around many Palestinian areas in the West
Bank, while shorter fences have been built along Israel’s
borders with Gaza and Egypt.
More recently, Hungary erected a border
fence with Serbia to prevent migrants from crossing into the
country. Macedonia decided to block the border with Greece,
and Bulgaria with Turkey, for the same reason.
Kenya,
Saudi Arabia and Turkey constructed border fences in a bid
to keep out jihadist groups next door in Somalia, Iraq and
Syria, respectively.
Along the Moroccan border with Western
Sahara a sand wall called the “Berm,” is surrounded by mines
to stop Polisario Front fighters from crossing. It is second
in length only to the Great Wall of China, and has kept
families separated for decades.
Numerous other countries, including China,
Greece, Kuwait, Spain, Thailand, Uzbekistan, and the United
Arab Emirates, launched new fence construction projects over
the past decade.
It isn’t the borderless world of the
utopian dreamers just yet. As long as there are sovereign
states, there will be borders, even if “soft” ones.
No comments:
Post a Comment