By Henry Srebrnik, [Charlottetown, PEI] Guardian
I’ve never been a fan of Hillary Clinton’s, yet I was still shocked that she would stoop so low as to mock Donald Trump at the Jan. 28 Grammy Awards, no matter what we all think of him.
She read a chapter from Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Michael Wolff’s recently-published savage account of the president. It was the most classless thing I’ve ever seen her do.
First of all, she’s not an entertainer, but a supposedly serious political figure. This wasn’t “Saturday Night Live,” where such people routinely make fun of the president.
How would Clinton like it if Trump read part of Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, a 2015 book by Peter Schweizer.
Even Al Gore, who had every right to be far more angry than Clinton – in 2000 he most probably won the presidential election, and not just by the popular vote but also the electoral vote – never did this to George W. Bush, and there were plenty of opportunities.
None of previous defeated candidates even came close to acting this way – certainly not in a public forum televised to millions of people.
I’ve never been a fan of Hillary Clinton’s, yet I was still shocked that she would stoop so low as to mock Donald Trump at the Jan. 28 Grammy Awards, no matter what we all think of him.
She read a chapter from Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, Michael Wolff’s recently-published savage account of the president. It was the most classless thing I’ve ever seen her do.
First of all, she’s not an entertainer, but a supposedly serious political figure. This wasn’t “Saturday Night Live,” where such people routinely make fun of the president.
How would Clinton like it if Trump read part of Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich, a 2015 book by Peter Schweizer.
Even Al Gore, who had every right to be far more angry than Clinton – in 2000 he most probably won the presidential election, and not just by the popular vote but also the electoral vote – never did this to George W. Bush, and there were plenty of opportunities.
None of previous defeated candidates even came close to acting this way – certainly not in a public forum televised to millions of people.
Had a student written something as
demeaning as the excerpt Clinton read out, they would likely
have been suspended from their school. Had I done something
similar to a colleague in front of a class, I’d be fired, and
rightly so. It would be considered bullying.
Clinton clearly can’t get over losing to Trump. After all, her sense of entitlement was such, and her devoted fans were so enamoured of her, that she considered winning the presidency a foregone conclusion – especially against a man who would only be getting the votes of the “deplorables ” in “flyover” country.
Clinton clearly can’t get over losing to Trump. After all, her sense of entitlement was such, and her devoted fans were so enamoured of her, that she considered winning the presidency a foregone conclusion – especially against a man who would only be getting the votes of the “deplorables ” in “flyover” country.
Trump voters probably don’t buy most of the
recordings showcased at the Grammys, nor do they go to many of
the movies Hollywood liberals produce. So it won't hurt those
bottom lines.
But it does demonstrate to these people that the whole entertainment industry has become a machine designed to mock and belittle them. Even those who think Trump is a buffoon, and they are many, won’t forget this slight.
But it does demonstrate to these people that the whole entertainment industry has become a machine designed to mock and belittle them. Even those who think Trump is a buffoon, and they are many, won’t forget this slight.
And
here’s irony: The woman who ran as a transformational
feminist in 2016 is being increasingly shunned by her party,
according to numerous sources.
Some
reports have asserted that the current news of
harassment reminds many of Hillary Clinton’s past as an
enabler of a serial abuser, her husband. It now has also become
known that in 2008, she shielded one of her campaign advisers
from accusations of sexual harassment.
And of course, Bill Clinton’s own past
behaviour embodies what is considered absolutely unacceptable
by current standards; he would have been chased out of office
by his own Democratic Party today.
So tone-deaf is Clinton that, as an opinion
piece in the Jan 30 New York Times – a paper not exactly a fan
of Trump! – pointed out, she read from a book that, without
any evidence, insinuates that Nikki Haley, the UN ambassador,
is sleeping with the president.
So it’s not difficult to imagine how Haley
might have felt when she watched the Grammys.
“A prominent Republican woman is smeared,”
writes the author, Barry Weiss. “The author who does the
smearing is celebrated by all the A-listers, including the
most prominent Democratic woman in the country, who herself
has a history of giving a pass (or worse) to men accused of
sexual assault and harassment.”
Pray for the fate of the American republic!
No comments:
Post a Comment