Professor Henry Srebrnik

Professor Henry Srebrnik

Monday, February 12, 2018

Iran is a Religiously Nationalistic Country

By Henry Srebrnik, [Summerside, PEI] Journal Pioneer

Many of the most potent and emotional forms of nationalism are sustained by religion. Faith reinforces the feeling that the country and its people have a special destiny, one that encompasses its past, present, and future.

In his book Chosen Peoples: Sacred Sources of National Identity, the late Anthony D. Smith, professor of nationalism and ethnicity at the London School of Economics, argued that sacred belief remains central to national identity. 

Their homelands are more than just geographic territories, they are part of their very being.

Think of the connection to nationhood of Roman Catholicism in Poland, Buddhism in Burma, Judaism in Israel, Sunni Islam in Turkey, Orthodox Christianity in Russia, and various evangelical Protestant denominations in the United States – even though America is a more diverse nation.

One of the most powerful creeds, Shi’a Islam, has buttressed the strong national identity of the Persians of Iran for centuries and continues to do so. It is fundamental to the country’s sense of itself. Past history is never forgotten, slights from foes rarely forgiven.

Beginning in the 16th century, the new Safavid dynasty converted most Persians to Shi’a Islam, establishing it as the official religion of their empire. 

In the 20th century, the emperors of Iran concocted a more “secular” form of Iranian nationalism, one centred around the Persian people and their ancient empires dating back millennia, rather than one emphasizing Islam. It didn’t work. 

The last Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, saw his regime fall apart like a house of cards, overtaken by the fervour that an aging Shi’a cleric, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, was able to inculcate, long-distance, in 1978-79. 

This virtually bloodless regime change only proved possible thanks to the underlying Shi’a cultural hegemony that had remained suppressed, but could never be extinguished through either brute force or political “modernization.”

As a minority used to centuries of persecution, many Shias had adopted the tactic of taqiyya, religious dissimulation, to conceal their true allegiance.

Shi’a Islam has preserved Iranian culture and nationalism and the two are inseparable. The Islamic Republic is devoted to both Shiite religious figures and war martyrs. 

This has provided the country with a powerful defence against the largely Sunni Turkish and Arab Middle East and provided it with a world-historical sense of religious destiny.

The origins of Shi‘ism lie in the dispute that followed the death of the Prophet Muhammad in 632. While the people who came to be known as Sunnis accepted the succession of three caliphs or deputies who were members of the Prophet’s tribe, the Quraish, those who became Shia or partisans of Ali, the Prophet’s first cousin, believe that Ali was his rightful successor to the caliphate. 

Ali’s younger son Hussein, who tried to claim the succession in 680, became the archetypal martyr after the battle of Karbala, when he and his companions were massacred by troops of the Ummayad Sunni caliph Mu‘awiya.

The tragedy of Karbala, celebrated in the annual ta‘ziya passion plays in the month of Ashura, dwells on the nobility of Hussein’s conduct, and the cruelty of his enemies, hence keeping his memory alive. 

In his book Iran: From Religious Dispute to Revolution, anthropologist Michael M. J. Fischer of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology has described “the emotionally potent theme of corrupt and oppressive tyranny” that, in Shi’a Islam, must eventually be overcome. 

As Matthew Pierce, an assistant Professor of Religion at Centre College in Danville, Kentucky, argues in Twelve Infallible Men, the majority Sunni theological outlook springs historically from the victories of the early caliphs on the field of battle.

Yet, even though by the 10th century, the Muslim community had expanded exponentially, Shi’a Muslims felt that it had gone astray because Muslims had not followed the right leaders – their imams. 

So they challenged the dominant narrative of Islamic success with stories of loss and stressed the themes of oppression, martyrdom, and the hope of a better world with the eventual arrival the Twelfth Imam, the Mahdi.

Recently, large anti-government protests spread throughout the country. Many wondered if this was the beginning of the end of Iran’s Islamic Republic. 

It’s unlikely. Shi’a Islam has provided Iran with a bulwark against foes foreign and domestic.

No comments: