An
Aug. 12 riot in Charlottesville, Virginia pitted white
supremacists and neo-Nazis against their Antifa opponents,
leading to the murder, by a neo-Nazi, of one person, with
another 19 injured.
The
main organizer of the Charlottesville rally, Jason Kessler,
had contended, at a gathering held in Washington on June 27,
that the country “would be better off if the South had won the
Civil War.”
The Antifa
group, a “diverse collection of anarchists, communists and
socialists,” according to an Aug. 17 article in the New York
Times, has found common cause in opposing right-wing
extremists and white supremacists.
“The
essence of their message is violence,” Jed Holtz, an Antifa
organizer in New York, said of his right-wing foes, so Antifa
“is just responding.”
The
group gained publicity in February when it physically fought
alt-right supporters at the University of California,
Berkeley, during a speech by alt-right ideologue Milo
Yiannopoulos.
Violence
is now considered by some on the left, especially at elite
colleges and universities, to be an acceptable response to
political differences. In turn, on the right, provocateurs
cause riots on campuses.
Democracies
require compromise. Elected majorities should act with
restraint and reciprocity, and politicians should campaign
without disparaging their opponents’ patriotism or loyalty.
This is where things are going wrong. Yascha
Mounk, a Harvard University political scientist who writes about
democracy, believes that partisanship in the United States today
is dangerously deep.
Many Americans have such loyalty to their
political tribe that they are willing to go along with deeply
undemocratic behaviour.
“American
citizens are not just dissatisfied with the performance of
particular governments; they are increasingly critical of
liberal democracy itself,” Mounk noted in an article
co-authored with Roberto Stefan Foa of the University of
Melbourne, published in the January issue of the Journal of
Democracy.
Furthermore,
the generation gap is striking: the proportion of younger
citizens who believe it is essential to live in a democracy
now stands at only 30 per cent, as opposed to 72 per cent among
those born before the Second World War.
So when Trump insisted that there had been
“violence on both sides” in Charlottesville, Democrats “heard a
dangerous moral equivalence between neo-Nazis and the people who
opposed them,” observed New York Times reporter Sabrina
Tavernise in an Aug. 19 article.
“But for many Trump supporters, his words appealed to a basic sense of fairness.”
“But for many Trump supporters, his words appealed to a basic sense of fairness.”
John Zaller, a political scientist at the
University of California, Los Angeles, who studies
public opinion, has suggested that the president’s
comments about Charlottesville raise the possibility of creating
a two-sided issue out of racial equality.
Nevertheless, since the events in
Charlottesville, the roof has, metaphorically speaking, fallen
in at the White House, with condemnations of Trump arriving from
all directions – including from dozens of Republican lawmakers.
“I do believe that he messed up in his
comments,” Paul Ryan, Speaker of the U.S. House of
Representatives, said on Aug. 21. “It sounded like a moral
equivocation or at the very least moral ambiguity when we need
extreme moral clarity.”
A few days later, Steve Bannon was forced out
of his job as President Trump’s chief strategist and resumed his
previous position with Breitbart News. He vowed to continue his
crusade against the left on the site.
No comments:
Post a Comment