By Henry Srebrnik, [Summerside, PEI] Journal Pioneer
Thanks in part to people like our foreign
minister, Chrystia Freeland, we have a picture of Ukraine as
a plucky democracy, fending off the Russian bear.
Ukrainian Prime Minister Volodymyr
Groysman visited Canada in late October, met with Justin
Trudeau, and was feted with a Ukrainian Day on Parliament
Hill, at s reception organized by the Canada-Ukraine
Parliamentary Program.
Pointing to the “deep friendship between
Canada and Ukraine,” Trudeau expressed his government’s
intention to “build on the growing economic ties between our
countries.”
The coming into force of the
Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement in August, he said, is
“an opportunity to create even greater opportunities for our
citizens to grow the economies and to deepen the friendship
we have with Ukraine.”
Canada will always stand with Ukraine,
Trudeau added, “whether it’s against illegitimate, illegal
Russian actions or in other world spheres.”
Groysman also visited Toronto, where he
addressed the Ukrainian-Canadian Business Forum on October
30, and traveled to Montreal, to seek investment from
Canadian aerospace companies in Ukraine’s airplane industry.
The love-in during the Ottawa visit was
only marred when one MP asked Groysman about Ukraine’s
anti-corruption initiatives in light of recent protests in
Kyiv by thousands of people calling for the resignation of
his government for failing to tackle the country’s culture
of corruption.
In fact the reality in today’s Ukraine is
just that. Its president, Petro Poroshenko, has been accused
of delaying efforts to set up a specialised anti-corruption
court, while undermining the independence of the agency
tasked with investigating corrupt officials.
Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of
the International Monetary Fund (IMF), on Dec. 6 stated that
the IMF is “deeply concerned by recent events in Ukraine
that could roll back progress that has been made in setting
up independent institutions to tackle high-level corruption,
including the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine
(NABU) and the Special Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office
(SAPO).
She was referring to a bill under
parliamentary consideration that would undermine the
country’s only independent investigative body by dismissing
its chief.
Mikheil Saakashvili rose to power in
Georgia in 2003 with a crusade against corruption. But after
he launched a war with Russia in 2008, his country suffered
a catastrophic defeat. He lost power in 2013 and arrived in
Ukraine in 2015.
Given Saakashvili’s anti-Russian
credentials, at first he and Poroshenko were friends.
Saakashvili was given Ukrainian citizenship and made
governor of Odessa. But 18 months later Saakashvili
resigned, accusing the president of failing to support him
in the fight against endemic corruption and graft.
The two are now enemies. Poroshenko
stripped Saakashvili of Ukrainian citizenship while he was
out of the country in July, but he came back in September,
helped by supporters who broke through a police line at the
Polish border.
On Dec. 8 Saakashvili was arrested in
Kyiv. Ukrainian Prosecutor General Yuri Lutsenko claimed
that Saakashvili had received $500,000 from an ally of
Ukraine’s former President Viktor Yanukovych to finance his
protests.
“We
will go to parliament and call for the impeachment of
Poroshenko, who is a thief, who is mega-corrupt and is
plundering the whole of Ukraine,” he had told a BBC reporter
prior to his detention.
A few days later, several thousand
protesters shouted ‘Shame’ and ‘Impeachment’ as they marched
to Maidan Square in his support and in opposition to the
president.
Saakashvili won support from other
Ukrainian opposition leaders, including former Prime
Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. She criticized the arrest as
“political terror.”
Ukraine remains a relatively poor
country, with a per capita GDP of $2,800. Transparency
International’s Corruption Perceptions Index places it very
low, at 131 out of 176 countries.
The main causes of corruption in Ukraine
are a weak justice system, an over-controlling
non-transparent government, combined with overly-close
business ties to government, and a weak civil society.
No comments:
Post a Comment