By Henry Srebrnik, [Summerside, PEI] Journal Pioneer
In an interview in
1994 the novelist and historian Shelby Foote spoke about the
reconciliation in the wake of the 1861-1865 American Civil
War, often referred to as the Great Compromise.
It consists of Southerners admitting freely that it’s probably best that the Union wasn’t divided, and the North admits rather freely that the South fought bravely for a cause in which it believed, and that is a Great Compromise and we live with that and that works for us, he explained.
It consists of Southerners admitting freely that it’s probably best that the Union wasn’t divided, and the North admits rather freely that the South fought bravely for a cause in which it believed, and that is a Great Compromise and we live with that and that works for us, he explained.
It
started not long after the end of the war. The 13th amendment had been ratified in December 1865,
eight months after the conclusion of hostilities. While it
abolished slavery, the battle over full citizenship for
African-Americans continued during Reconstruction.
There was widespread resistance to black male suffrage,
which had been guaranteed by the 15th amendment. Tensions came
to a climax with the deadlocked presidential election of 1876,
when the results in Florida, South Carolina and Louisiana were
disputed.
The impasse ended with the Compromise of 1877, in which
the Republican candidate, Rutherford B. Hayes, was granted
those states’ electoral votes in exchange for an end to
federal support for Republican governments in the former
states of the defeated Confederacy. Reconstruction was
effectively over.
The election was
as close as it was because Northerners had already compromised
on the 15th amendment, according to Kate Masur, a
historian at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.
“If there hadn’t been voter suppression in the South
from the outset of Reconstruction through the 1876 election
itself, Hayes might well have won the presidency decisively.”
After Reconstruction was rolled back and Jim Crow
segregation instituted in the South, a growing number of white
Americans depicted the Civil War as a tragic family
disagreement, rather than a battle over principle.
In 1913, veterans from both sides gathered at
Gettysburg for a “Great Reunion,” where President Woodrow
Wilson gave an address that included no reference to slavery
or secession.
Hollywood movies from The Birth of a Nation through
Gone With the Wind glorified the “lost cause.” Many portrayed
northern soldiers and politicians as unfeeling “carpetbaggers”
who were unable to appreciate the “Southern way of life.”
Even today, many monuments and street names continue to memorialize Southern heroes like Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.
Even today, many monuments and street names continue to memorialize Southern heroes like Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson.
Defenders of such
monuments point out that such statues weren’t erected to
celebrate the institution of slavery; they were erected to
celebrate Southern history.
Members of the Sons
of Confederate Veterans say they are meant to honour their
ancestors and other Confederate soldiers who they believe
fought for noble causes.
As they describe it,
the North was invading the South, and the soldiers were
fighting to defend their homes, their land and their families
against invaders who pillaged their towns.
“It reflects a very old set of ideas about the meaning
of the Civil War,” according to David Blight, a
historian at Yale University in New Haven.
“Everybody was right, and nobody was wrong. Everybody
was noble, everyone fought for their conscience, you don’t
have to worry anymore about what they fought for.”
In actual fact white
Southerners had embarked on a propaganda campaign that
romanticized slavery, idealized the Confederate past and held
that white supremacy would restore lost Southern greatness.
The Confederate
monuments that sprang up in public spaces across the South
were an essential part of that campaign.
There were two
particular waves of Confederate memorials and building naming,
the first in the period between 1900 and the 1920s and the
second between the 1950s and the 1960s, during the
segregationist backlash to the civil rights movement.
Today, though, at
least 30 Confederate memorials around the country have been
removed following violence in Charlottesville, Virginia in
August of last year.
White supremacists
had rallied against a
proposal to remove a statue of General Lee from a public park.
Just recently,
protesters toppled a statue of a Confederate soldier on the
campus of the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.
Demonstrators supportive of the monument’s removal later
clashed with protesters advocating its preservation.
Nearby Duke
University announced that it will not return its Lee statue to
the space in the university chapel where it stood until 2017.
All of this
indicates that the Great Compromise is proving an obsolete
narrative for understanding American history.
No comments:
Post a Comment